Model Year | 2007 | 2012 | |
Model | Cadillac STS | Honda Fit | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 116.4 in | 98.4 in | 18 in |
Length | 196.3 in | 161.6 in | 34.7 in |
Width | 72.6 in | 66.7 in | 5.9 in |
Height | 57.6 in | 60.0 in | -2.4 in |
Curb Weight | 3960 lb. | 2496 lb. | 1464 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 17.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 6.4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 40.4 in | -1.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.6 in | 52.7 in | 5.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.6 in | 51.5 in | 3.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.6 in | 41.3 in | 1.3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 37.9 in | 39.0 in | -1.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.4 in | 51.3 in | 6.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.6 in | 51.3 in | 4.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 34.5 in | 3.8 in |
Total Legroom | 80.9 in (over 2 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 5.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.8 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -6.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.8 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | -43.5 ft3 |
2007 Cadillac STS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr Sedan 254-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
No room in the back...even tight for kids. see full Cadillac STS review |
2006 | 4dr Sedan 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Very tight legroom. see full Cadillac STS review |
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |