| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Cadillac XTS and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Cadillac XTS | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 227 kW@6800 358 Nm@5200 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 265 kW@5600 519 Nm@4100 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,837 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,131 mm | 5,182 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm | 2,045 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,511 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,912 kg | 2,578 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 98 L | -26 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 991 mm | 1,087 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,471 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,151 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 960 mm | 983 mm | -23 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,654 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,379 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 968 mm | -968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,590 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,252 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 630 mm | -630 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,085 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 510 L | 433 L | 77 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 18.0 | 1,461 L | 17 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 18.0 | 2,682 L | 16 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS
| 2013 Cadillac XTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The generously sized front buckets inside the XTS are among the most comfortable and supportive you'll find, assuming you like your seating on the firm (if not quite Audi-firm) side. Those seeking a cushier seat with an optional massager (not offered in the XTS) will find one in the MKS. Both cars' front seats provide more lateral support than you might expect from America's remaining large luxury sedans, but still not a lot. After all, hardcore canyon carving isn't the primary objective. Despite their much larger number of adjustments, I found the Audi A8's front seats to be overly firm and less form-fitting than those in the Detroiters. The rear seat of the XTS is also quite comfortable--for two people. Basing the XTS on GM's Epsilon platform, originally created for much smaller cars, has a cost. It's much cheaper and easier to lengthen a platform than to widen one. So the XTS is essentially a stretched midsize sedan rather than a truly large one. Rear legroom is abundant despite insufficient space for feet beneath the front seats, but the cabin is decidedly midsize in breadth. The compact Dodge Dart (admittedly wide and heavy for its class) provides as much space for shoulders. Rear seat passengers sit much closer to the front seats in the MKS, which consequently doesn't feel nearly as roomy in back. But the Lincoln's rear seat cushion is higher off the floor, and so provides better thigh support for adults. The Audi easily provides the most space for three abreast. For XTS-matching legroom, though, you'll have to step up to the extended wheelbase version. see full Cadillac XTS review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
