| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Cadillac XTS and 2019 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2019 | |
| Model | Cadillac XTS | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 304 hp@6800 264 lb-ft@5200 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 310 lb-ft@2000 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,837 mm | 2,929 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,131 mm | 5,065 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm | 1,969 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,511 mm | 1,753 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,817 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 72 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 991 mm | 998 mm | -7 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,471 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 960 mm | 978 mm | -18 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,379 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,349 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,019 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 754 mm | -754 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,085 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 510 L | 408 L | 102 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 18.0 | 1,082 L | 17 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 18.0 | 2,016 L | 16 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS
| 2013 Cadillac XTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The generously sized front buckets inside the XTS are among the most comfortable and supportive you'll find, assuming you like your seating on the firm (if not quite Audi-firm) side. Those seeking a cushier seat with an optional massager (not offered in the XTS) will find one in the MKS. Both cars' front seats provide more lateral support than you might expect from America's remaining large luxury sedans, but still not a lot. After all, hardcore canyon carving isn't the primary objective. Despite their much larger number of adjustments, I found the Audi A8's front seats to be overly firm and less form-fitting than those in the Detroiters. The rear seat of the XTS is also quite comfortable--for two people. Basing the XTS on GM's Epsilon platform, originally created for much smaller cars, has a cost. It's much cheaper and easier to lengthen a platform than to widen one. So the XTS is essentially a stretched midsize sedan rather than a truly large one. Rear legroom is abundant despite insufficient space for feet beneath the front seats, but the cabin is decidedly midsize in breadth. The compact Dodge Dart (admittedly wide and heavy for its class) provides as much space for shoulders. Rear seat passengers sit much closer to the front seats in the MKS, which consequently doesn't feel nearly as roomy in back. But the Lincoln's rear seat cushion is higher off the floor, and so provides better thigh support for adults. The Audi easily provides the most space for three abreast. For XTS-matching legroom, though, you'll have to step up to the extended wheelbase version. see full Cadillac XTS review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-9
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-9.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
