(2012) vs. Mercedes-Benz SLK (2006) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 and 2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK specs.
2012 and 2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2006 |
|
Model |
|
Mercedes-Benz SLK |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012
2013 |
Step inside, and you'll discover another good reason to buy a Cadillac XTS. The large, cushy (but not at all mushy) front seats are among the most comfortable and supportive you'll find in any car, rivaling the best from BMW, Lexus, and Volvo and easily besting the seats in the Audi and Mercedes.
The rear seat of the XTS is also quite comfortable--for two people. Basing the XTS on GM's Epsilon platform, originally created for much smaller cars, has a cost. It's much cheaper and easier to lengthen a platform than to widen one. So the XTS is essentially a stretched midsize sedan rather than a large one. Rear legroom is abundant despite insufficient space for feet beneath the front seats, but the cabin is very much midsize in breadth. The compact Dodge Dart (admittedly wide and heavy for its class) provides as much space for shoulders.
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 .
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK
2005 |
2dr Hardtop conv. |
Ample leg room and headroom - up to about 6ft 5 is fine
I'm 6ft3 and with the roof off I don't get too ruffled unless I go over about 85 mph
Lots of other things to like (and the running costs arent too horrendous) but I'm limiting myself to my top three
see full Mercedes-Benz SLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Cadillac models.