| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Chevrolet Aveo and 2015 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Aveo | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 97.6 in | 114.8 in | -17.2 in |
| Length | 166.7 in | 195.5 in | -28.8 in |
| Width | 65.7 in | 74.7 in | -9 in |
| Height | 58.8 in | 57.9 in | 0.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 2365 lb. | 3975 lb. | -1610 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 12.0 gal. | 19.0 gal. | -7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.2 in | 38.7 in | 0.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.6 in | 59.1 in | -5.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.6 in | 57.2 in | -5.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 42.3 in | -1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 38.0 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.7 in | 59.0 in | -6.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.8 in | 58.0 in | -5.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.3 in | 39.7 in | -4.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 76.5 in (over 2 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | -5.5 in |
| Cargo Volume | 11.6 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | -4.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Aveo
| 2006 Chevrolet Aveo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 103-horsepower 1.6L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I am a tall guy and I can sit comfortably without having to adjust the seat very much at all see full Chevrolet Aveo review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 103-horsepower 1.6L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
As a tall guy I usually have a tough time with back seats but not in my aveo see full Chevrolet Aveo review |
| 2006 Chevrolet Aveo Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 103-horsepower 1.6L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
really uncomfortable see full Chevrolet Aveo review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
