| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Chevrolet Camaro and 2016 Dodge Charger Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Dodge Charger | |
| Engine | supercharged 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 580 hp@6000 556 lb-ft@4200 |
supercharged 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 707 hp@6000 650 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 3,053 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,836 mm | 5,039 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,918 mm | 1,905 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,377 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,882 kg | 2,075 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 70 L | 2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 950 mm | 980 mm | -30 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,427 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 897 mm | 930 mm | -33 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,280 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,425 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 759 mm | 1,019 mm | 758 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,080 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 320 L | 456 L | -136 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
