Model Year | 2015 | 2016 | |
Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Ford Expedition | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 3,023 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,836 mm | 5,245 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,918 mm | 2,002 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,377 mm | 1,961 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,715 kg | 2,517 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 106 L | -34 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 950 mm | 1,006 mm | 949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,605 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,506 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,044 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 897 mm | 1,011 mm | 896 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,080 mm | 1,618 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,521 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 759 mm | 993 mm | -234 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 973 mm | -973 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,318 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,275 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 958 mm | -958 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,995 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 320 L | 527 L | -207 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 11.3 | 1,557 L | 10.3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 11.3 | 3,067 L | 8.3 |
2015 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Neither rear seat has enough headroom for someone of even my modest (5-9) height. I could scrunch down and ride back there for a little while, but I'd almost rather walk. Getting into and out of the back seat pose additional challenges. If you want a somewhat similar car with an adult-worthy back seat, check out the much larger, much heavier Dodge Challenger. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Camaro.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Expedition.