Model Year | 2015 | 2019 | |
Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Ford Expedition | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 3,112 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,836 mm | 5,334 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,918 mm | 2,029 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,377 mm | 1,946 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,715 kg | 2,469 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 88 L | -16 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 950 mm | 1,067 mm | 949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,648 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,580 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 897 mm | 1,016 mm | 896 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,080 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,590 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 759 mm | 1,054 mm | 758 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 947 mm | -947 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,631 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,306 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 917 mm | -917 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 3,012 mm (over 3 rows) | -2 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 320 L | 547 L | -227 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 11.3 | 1,628 L | 10.3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 11.3 | 2,962 L | 9.3 |
2015 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Neither rear seat has enough headroom for someone of even my modest (5-9) height. I could scrunch down and ride back there for a little while, but I'd almost rather walk. Getting into and out of the back seat pose additional challenges. If you want a somewhat similar car with an adult-worthy back seat, check out the much larger, much heavier Dodge Challenger. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Camaro.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Ford Expedition.