Model Year | 2015 | 2016 | |
Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Ford Explorer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 2,860 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,836 mm | 5,037 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,918 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,377 mm | 1,778 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,715 kg | 2,022 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 70 L | 2 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 950 mm | 1,052 mm | 949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,562 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,455 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 897 mm | 1,031 mm | 896 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,080 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,443 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 759 mm | 1,003 mm | 758 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,290 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,034 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 846 mm | -846 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,880 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 320 L | 595 L | -275 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 11.3 | 1,243 L | 10.3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 11.3 | 2,313 L | 9.3 |
2015 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Neither rear seat has enough headroom for someone of even my modest (5-9) height. I could scrunch down and ride back there for a little while, but I'd almost rather walk. Getting into and out of the back seat pose additional challenges. If you want a somewhat similar car with an adult-worthy back seat, check out the much larger, much heavier Dodge Challenger. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Camaro.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Explorer.