Model Year | 2011 | 2013 | |
Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Ford Transit Connect | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr Minivan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 2,911 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,836 mm | 4,590 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,918 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,389 mm | 2,014 mm | -1 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,812 kg | 1,554 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 58 L | 13 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 960 mm | 1,298 mm | 959 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,443 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,290 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 907 mm | 1,283 mm | 906 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,080 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,519 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 759 mm | 978 mm | -219 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 2,212 L | 287 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 3,831 L | 7.2 |
2011 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The interior leather seats are extremely comfortable to the point where my wife commented that she could sit in them for hours more.They are firm with good support. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Envelops you in a cocoon from which to manage the beat within. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
2011 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
comfort is fine, but not for large adults. All the kids are gone now so no problem for me. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not to complain about a great car, but a muscle car like the Camaro is really bought as a 2 seater, but for short trips, can accomodate 4. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.