Chevrolet Camaro (2010) vs. Volvo V60 (2016) Specs

vs.

◆

2010 Chevrolet Camaro and 2016 Volvo V60 Specifications

Model Year	2010	2016
Model	Chevrolet Camaro	Volvo V60
Engine	6.2L V8 OHV-2v 400 hp@5900 410 lb-ft@4300	turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 345 hp@5250 369 lb-ft@3000
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	RWD	AWD
Body	2dr Coupe	4dr Wagon
			Difference
Wheelbase	112.3 in	109.3 in	3 in
Length	190.4 in	182.5 in	7.9 in
Width	75.5 in	73.4 in	2.1 in
Height	54.2 in	58.4 in	-4.2 in
Curb Weight	3913 lb.	3790 lb.	123 lb.
Fuel Capacity	19.0 gal.	17.8 gal.	1.2 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	37.4 in	38.7 in	-1.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	56.9 in	57.0 in	-0.1 in
Hip Room, Row 1	0.0 in	54.9 in	-54.9 in
Legroom, Row 1	42.4 in	41.9 in	0.5 in
Headroom, Row 2	35.3 in	37.4 in	-2.1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	50.4 in	55.2 in	-4.8 in
Hip Room, Row 2	0.0 in	53.5 in	-53.5 in
Legroom, Row 2	29.9 in	33.5 in	-3.6 in
Total Legroom	72.3 in (over 2 rows)	75.4 in (over 2 rows)	-3.1 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	11.3 ft³	15.2 ft³	-3.9 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	11.3 ft³	43.8 ft³	-32.5 ft³

2010 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2010	2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	The interior leather seats are extremely comfortable to the point where my wife commented that she could sit in them for hours more.They are firm with good support. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010	2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	Envelops you in a cocoon from which to manage the beat within. see full Chevrolet Camaro review

2010 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2010	2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	comfort is fine, but not for large adults. All the kids are gone now so no problem for me. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010	2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Not to complain about a great car, but a muscle car like the Camaro is really bought as a 2 seater, but for short trips, can accomodate 4. see full Chevrolet Camaro review

2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2015	The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review

2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.

See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.

See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.