| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Chevrolet Colorado and 2005 Ford Ranger Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2005 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Colorado | Ford Ranger | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Colorado
| 2006 Chevrolet Colorado Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Crew Cab 5ft bed 220-horsepower 3.5L I5 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Plenty of rear seat room. Just like a passenger car. see full Chevrolet Colorado review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2005 Ford Ranger
| 2005 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear compartment of Ranger extended cab is smaller and has side-facing jumpseats. see full Ford Ranger review |
| 2004 | 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
The jump seats in a Ranger are not very practical for long trips what so ever, not much room other than for storage, and they are not comfortable. I think that a Full 4 door model of the Ranger would be great, maybe a redesign will incorporate a backseat see full Ford Ranger review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
