| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet Cruze and 2014 Honda Odyssey Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2014 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Cruze | Honda Odyssey | |
| Engine | turbocharged 1.4L I4 DOHC-4v 153 hp@5600 177 lb-ft@2000 |
3.5L V6 w/DoD OHC-4v 248 hp@5700 250 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 118.1 in | -11.8 in |
| Length | 175.3 in | 202.9 in | -27.6 in |
| Width | 70.5 in | 79.2 in | -8.7 in |
| Height | 57.4 in | 68.4 in | -11 in |
| Curb Weight | 2920 lb. | 4396 lb. | -1476 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.7 gal. | 21.0 gal. | -7.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.9 in | 39.7 in | -0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 64.4 in | -9.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.2 in | 58.2 in | -5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 40.9 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 39.5 in | -1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.2 in | 63.5 in | -10.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.9 in | 66.1 in | -14.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.1 in | 40.9 in | -4.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.0 in | -38 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 60.9 in | -60.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 48.4 in | -48.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 42.4 in | -42.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.1 in (over 2 rows) | 124.2 in (over 3 rows) | -46.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 22.7 ft3 | 38.4 ft3 | -15.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 22.7 | 93.1 ft3 | -70.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 47.2 ft3 | 148.5 ft3 | -101.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet Cruze
| 2017 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | The old Chevrolet Cruze, like the Ford Focus, had a rear seat on the tight side even by compact sedan standards. According to the specs, the new one has only gained a few tenths of legroom. But the improvement feels much larger. Chevrolet claims that rear knee room (not a standard spec) has increased by two inches, and this aligns much better with my perceptions. Some competitors, including the Honda Civic, continue to offer more rear seat space. But the new Cruze's back seat could be the most comfortable in the class for two average-sized men. With a position well above the floor, the rear seat cushion provides much better thigh support than the typical sedan, much less the typical compact sedan. The Civic has a lower rear cushion and insufficient foot space under its front seats, squandering its on-paper legroom advantage. Up front the Cruze has comfortable seats (though, like those in the Civic, without adjustable lumbar support) but shoulder room typical of a compact car. The Civic has two more inches of shoulder room and feels more like a midsize sedan in the front seat. Both cars have good driving positions with reasonably compact instrument panels. In L and LS trim, the new Cruze has a 14.9-cubic-foot trunk, nearly identical to that of the new Civic and about as large as you'll find in the class. But the LT and Premier have a compact spare tire that reduces cargo volume to 13.6 cubic feet. Still pretty good. Next year both cars will also be available as hatchbacks. see full Chevrolet Cruze review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet Cruze
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet Cruze.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Honda Odyssey
| 2014 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | I test a large crossover and think, "This third-row seat isn't bad." Then I drive a minivan and marvel at home much roomier it is inside than even the roomiest crossovers. This advantage increases the farther back in the vehicle you sit. Back in the third row, it's simply no contest. Among minivans, the Odyssey is the roomiest of the bunch. It's the only minivan with over 40 inches of legroom in each of its three rows. Total up the differences in the official specs, and the Toyota Sienna comes up nearly ten inches short (though the difference doesn't seem nearly so large in reality, maybe an inch or two). A Chrysler Town & Country? Over fourteen inches. A Toyota Highlander crossover has legroom specs similar to the Chrysler minivan, but its third row feels much more cramped. Moral of the story: don't trust the specs, sit in the cars yourself. In cabin breadth, the official specs have the Odyssey about equal to the Town & Country and a little narrower than the Sienna, but subjectively both the Honda and the Toyota feel broader and more open than the Chrysler. Then there's access to the rear rows. The feature most associated with minivans, their sliding side doors, are easier to open in tight parking spaces and provide a much larger opening. In terms of seat comfort, the Odyssey falls a little short of the Sienna, if only because it doesn't offer lounge chair-like legrests in the second row. Then again, for anyone over five feet tall to use these in the Toyota the second row seat must be slid back so far as to render the third row unusable. Either minivan has more comfortable second-row seats than most crossovers, including the Highlander, and third-row comfort is simply no contest. The Chrysler's second row seats aren't as comfortable, as they are more thinly constructed to enable them to fold beneath the floor. The Odyssey, Sienna, and Highlander can each be equipped to carry eight passengers (though the lounge seats in the Sienna eliminate one spot, and the three in the third row of the Highlander best have short legs). The Chrysler minivans can only seat seven. see full Honda Odyssey review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Honda Odyssey
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Honda Odyssey.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
