| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo and 2002 BMW Z3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2002 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo | BMW Z3 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo
| 2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior room is outstanding. Trunk room is phenomenal, especially with flip and fold flat rear seat. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 BMW Z3
| 2002 BMW Z3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Convertible 225-horsepower 3.0L I6 5-speed manual RWD |
Just as cramped, but the config does not fit me as well see full BMW Z3 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
