Model Year | 2006 | 2011 | |
Model | Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,807 mm | 2,436 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,996 mm | 4,079 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,852 mm | 1,740 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,417 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,521 kg | 1,196 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 66 L | 40 L | 26 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 968 mm | 937 mm | 31 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,481 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 0 mm | 927 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,448 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 909 mm | 0 mm | 909 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,986 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 447 L | 711 L | -264 L |
2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior room is outstanding. Trunk room is phenomenal, especially with flip and fold flat rear seat. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
2011 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |