| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Chevrolet SS and 2020 Cadillac CT6 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2020 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Cadillac CT6 | |
| Engine | 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 415 hp@5900 415 lb-ft@4600 |
turbocharged 4.2L V8 DOHC-4v 500 hp@5000 574 lb-ft@3400 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 10-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 3,109 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 5,227 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,880 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,813 kg | 2,102 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 74 L | -3 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,021 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 965 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,359 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,101 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 464 L | 433 L | 31 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Cadillac CT6
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Cadillac CT6.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
