| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Chevrolet SS and 2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2006 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,807 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 5,090 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,852 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,803 kg | 1,612 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 66 L | 6 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,001 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 960 mm | 5 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,029 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 464 L | 527 L | -63 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo
| 2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior room is outstanding. Trunk room is phenomenal, especially with flip and fold flat rear seat. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
