

Model Year | 2017 | 2018 | |
Model | Chevrolet SS | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 114.8 in | 104.3 in | 10.5 in |
Length | 195.5 in | 173.6 in | 21.9 in |
Width | 74.7 in | 72.0 in | 2.7 in |
Height | 57.9 in | 63.9 in | -6 in |
Curb Weight | 3997 lb. | 3640 lb. | 357 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 18.8 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 5.3 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 41.0 in | -2.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 55.9 in | 3.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 54.3 in | 2.9 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 40.4 in | 1.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 39.4 in | -1.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.0 in | 55.2 in | 3.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 51.9 in | 6.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 36.5 in | 3.2 in |
Total Legroom | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 5.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.4 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | -8.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | -36.2 ft3 |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Ford C-MAX.