| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Chevrolet SS and 2007 Ford Explorer Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2007 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Ford Explorer | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,888 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 4,912 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,872 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,803 kg | 2,014 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 85 L | -13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,011 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 983 mm | -18 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,496 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 937 mm | -936 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 950 mm | -950 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,349 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,151 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 886 mm | -886 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 464 L | 385 L | 79 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.4 | 1,243 L | 15.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 | 2,370 L | 14.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Explorer
| 2007 Ford Explorer Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
the front seat has plenty of leg room and seats hug you see full Ford Explorer review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Have driven from Maryland to Florida and back a couple of times, as well as 3-4 hours trips routinely. Seats are comfortable with no backache and don't have to stop every couple of hours due to fatigue. Could drive and be comfortable all day long. see full Ford Explorer review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
