Model Year | 2017 | 2011 | |
Model | Chevrolet SS | Ford Transit Connect | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Minivan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,911 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,966 mm | 4,590 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,897 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,471 mm | 2,014 mm | -1 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,813 kg | 1,554 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 58 L | 13 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,298 mm | 982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,290 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 1,283 mm | 964 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,519 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 464 L | 2,212 L | 462 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 | 3,831 L | 13.4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2011 Ford Transit Connect.