| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2015 Ford Transit Connect Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2015 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Ford Transit Connect | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 3,063 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 4,818 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,813 kg | 1,805 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 60 L | 11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,191 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 1,146 mm | 964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,049 mm | -1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,430 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,194 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 889 mm | -889 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 464 L | 561 L | -97 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.4 | 1,668 L | 15.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 | 2,951 L | 14.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect
| 2015 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
