Chevrolet SS (2016) vs. Subaru Forester (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Chevrolet SS and 2016 Subaru Forester specs.
2016 Chevrolet SS and 2016 Subaru Forester Specifications
Model Year |
2016 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Chevrolet SS |
Subaru Forester |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
114.8 in |
103.9 in |
10.9 in |
Length |
195.5 in |
180.9 in |
14.6 in |
Width |
74.7 in |
70.7 in |
4 in |
Height |
57.9 in |
66.4 in |
-8.5 in |
Curb Weight |
3997 lb. |
3296 lb. |
701 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
18.8 gal. |
15.9 gal. |
2.9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
38.7 in |
41.4 in |
-2.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
59.1 in |
57.0 in |
2.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
57.2 in |
0.0 in |
57.2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
42.3 in |
43.0 in |
-0.7 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
38.0 in |
39.8 in |
-1.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
59.0 in |
56.5 in |
2.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
58.0 in |
0.0 in |
58 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
39.7 in |
38.0 in |
1.7 in |
Total Legroom |
82 in (over 2 rows) |
81 in (over 2 rows) |
1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
16.4 ft3 |
34.4 ft3 |
-18 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
16.4 ft3 |
74.7 ft3 |
-58.3 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Forester
2015 |
4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
I'm 6'3" and often don't fit comfortable in vehicles. I found this had a very nice amount of front seat room. The center console tends to stay out of the way as well, some newer designs have the center stack moving into where my right knee would be. It's a very noticeable improvement over my previous 2009 Escape. I actually found the Forester more comfortable for me than the Outback. I was expecting the opposite.
see full Subaru Forester review |
2015 |
4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
After looking at Explorer's, I was surprised how much more room the Forester had in the back seat. Granted it doesn't have a third row, but if you don't need a 3rd row, the Forester is hard to beat in this segment for rear seat room. We can put a forward facing child seat in the back, move the front seat up a about 2 inches from all the way back and there's still plenty of front passenger room and my 1.5 year old son can't kick the back of the seat.
see full Subaru Forester review |
2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.0L H4 8-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
- Terrible front seat support - The cushions are too short - It's not noticeable on a test drive right away. I would not have bought the car! Test drive extensively!
- Surfaces where your elbows would lay are too hard - I purchased foam pads to make it feel better.
- Tall drivers like myself will struggle with the telescoping wheel's short extension range.
- It is hard to get into a fully comfortable driving position. The memory seats in the XT help somewhat by retaining your seat settings if moved.
- Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this twice
- Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this THREE times!
Subaru are you listening? The front seat cushions are WAY TOO SHORT!
see full Subaru Forester review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.