| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2015 Toyota Highlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2015 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Toyota Highlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 114.8 in | 109.8 in | 5 in |
| Length | 195.5 in | 191.1 in | 4.4 in |
| Width | 74.7 in | 75.8 in | -1.1 in |
| Height | 57.9 in | 68.1 in | -10.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3997 lb. | 4134 lb. | -137 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.8 gal. | 19.2 gal. | -0.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 40.7 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 59.3 in | -0.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 57.2 in | 0 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 44.2 in | -1.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 39.9 in | -1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.0 in | 59.6 in | -0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 57.1 in | 0.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 38.4 in | 1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.9 in | -35.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 55.0 in | -55 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 45.6 in | -45.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 27.7 in | -27.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 110.3 in (over 3 rows) | -28.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.4 ft3 | 13.8 ft3 | 2.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.4 | 42.3 ft3 | -25.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 ft3 | 83.7 ft3 | -67.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Highlander
| 2015 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Toyota replaced the 2013 Highlander's rear struts with control arms to enable a three-inch-wider third-row seat, and then used the extra space to cram in a third seating position. So if you need seats for eight people, only the Highlander will do in this threesome. A top-of-the-line Santa Fe only seats six. Other eight-pass options include the Honda Pilot and GM's large crossovers. But those three people best be small, as the Highlander doesn't have nearly as much rear legroom as the Pathfinder or the Santa Fe. To fit children of even middling size in the third row it's necessary to slide the second row well forward. The second row seat cushion is mounted too low for adult comfort. The Nissan's second row suffers from a similar shortcoming, but the Hyundai's does not. see full Toyota Highlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Highlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Highlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
