| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Chevrolet SS and 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2011 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Engine | 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 309 kW@5900 563 Nm@4600 |
5.7L V8 DOHC-4v 284 kW@5600 544 Nm@3600 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD w/low range | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 4,950 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,971 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,880 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,803 kg | 2,581 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 96 L | -24 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 973 mm | 10 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,519 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 988 mm | -23 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,552 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 914 mm | -913 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 914 mm | -914 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,582 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,488 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 721 mm | -721 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,710 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 464 L | 456 L | 8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.4 | 1,218 L | 15.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 | 2,313 L | 14.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
