| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Chevrolet Spark and 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2002 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Spark | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark
| 2014 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Great room and comfort for family of 6. Only vechile in this category in 2002 when purchased. 10 years later still in good shape, and happy with vehicle. Would have considered Ford Expedition EL if had been available. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
