| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Chevrolet Spark and 2013 Ford Transit Connect Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2013 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Spark | Ford Transit Connect | |
| Engine | 1.2L I4 DOHC-4v 84 hp@6400 83 lb-ft@4200 |
2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 136 hp@6300 128 lb-ft@4750 |
|
| Transmission | CVT | 4-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 93.5 in | 114.6 in | -21.1 in |
| Length | 144.7 in | 180.7 in | -36 in |
| Width | 62.9 in | 70.7 in | -7.8 in |
| Height | 61.0 in | 79.3 in | -18.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 2368 lb. | 3425 lb. | -1057 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 9.2 gal. | 15.4 gal. | -6.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.4 in | 51.1 in | -11.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 50.7 in | 54.4 in | -3.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 48.0 in | 50.8 in | -2.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 40.5 in | 1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 50.5 in | -13.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 49.7 in | 59.6 in | -9.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.5 in | 59.8 in | -12.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.2 in | 38.5 in | -3.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 79 in (over 2 rows) | -1.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 11.4 ft3 | 78.1 ft3 | -66.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 31.2 ft3 | 135.3 ft3 | -104.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark
| 2014 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect
| 2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
