| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Chevrolet Spark and 2014 Jeep Patriot Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Spark | Jeep Patriot | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
| 2012 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Jeep Patriot
| 2014 Jeep Patriot Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The front seats are uncomfortable. They are both crooked, leaning to the side, so you need a pillow to isolate your back from the side bolster on one side that digs into your back. The head restraints push your neck forward and are not removable for adjustment. The driver's seat could use a height adjuster ( apparently available as an option on some models ). see full Jeep Patriot review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
