| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Chevrolet Spark and 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2013 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Spark | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,375 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 3,675 mm | 4,641 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,598 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,549 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,029 kg | 1,540 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 35 L | 63 L | -28 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,288 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,219 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 973 mm | -26 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,262 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,207 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 894 mm | 935 mm | -41 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,265 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 993 mm | -993 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 704 mm | -704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 323 L | 422 L | -99 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 11.4 | 1,025 L | 10.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 883 L | 2,056 L | 881 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Spark.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
