| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Chevrolet Spark and 2014 Tesla Model S Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Spark | Tesla Model S | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
| 2012 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Tesla Model S
| 2014 Tesla Model S Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Tesla Model S are reasonably comfortable, but don't look or feel especially luxurious and provide little lateral support in turns. At least in the Performance model the side bolsters should be larger and/or adjustable. The seats in the A7 similarly need more aggressive bolsters. The seats in the S7 have them. see full Tesla Model S review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Tesla Model S
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Tesla Model S.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
