Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2014) vs. Audi TT (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2016 Audi TT specs.
2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2016 Audi TT Specifications
Model Year |
2014 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban |
Audi TT |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
2dr Hatch |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
116.0 in |
98.6 in |
17.4 in |
Length |
202.0 in |
164.7 in |
37.3 in |
Width |
79.0 in |
72.1 in |
6.9 in |
Height |
76.9 in |
53.2 in |
23.7 in |
Curb Weight |
5448 lb. |
3164 lb. |
2284 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
26.0 gal. |
14.5 gal. |
11.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
41.1 in |
37.1 in |
4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
65.3 in |
53.6 in |
11.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
64.4 in |
0.0 in |
64.4 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
41.3 in |
41.1 in |
0.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.2 in |
33.8 in |
5.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
65.2 in |
47.9 in |
17.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
60.6 in |
0.0 in |
60.6 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
39.0 in |
28.9 in |
10.1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
37.9 in |
0.0 in |
37.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
61.7 in |
0.0 in |
61.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
49.1 in |
0.0 in |
49.1 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
25.6 in |
0.0 in |
25.6 in |
Total Legroom |
105.9 in (over 3 rows) |
70 in (over 2 rows) |
35.9 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
16.9 ft3 |
12.0 ft3 |
4.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
60.3 ft3 |
12.0 |
48.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
108.9 ft3 |
25.1 ft3 |
83.8 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
2015 |
Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive.
The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition).
Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it.
In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result.
The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Audi TT
2016 |
The new Audi TT's seats rank among the best for support and comfort, something of a surprise since they are in a sports car, not a luxury sedan, and don't have many adjustments. The more powerful, more expensive TTS has front seats with adjustable side bolsters, but these aren't offered in the regular TT. The sport package for the BMW 2 Series includes seats with adjustable bolsters, yet they can't be made to fit my form as well as the Audi's do. Nor can those in larger, more expensive Audis. Puzzling.
see full Audi TT review |
2016 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Many people will probably leave the rear seat folded, as head room and legroom are both scant. People much over five feet in height simply won't fit. Even a BMW 2 Series has a considerably roomier rear seat.
see full Audi TT review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Audi TT
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Audi TT.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.