Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2002) vs. BMW 1-Series (2013) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2013 BMW 1-Series specs.
2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2013 BMW 1-Series Specifications
Model Year |
2002 |
2013 |
|
Model |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban |
BMW 1-Series |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
2002 |
4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Great room and comfort for family of 6. Only vechile in this category in 2002 when purchased. 10 years later still in good shape, and happy with vehicle. Would have considered Ford Expedition EL if had been available.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW 1-Series
2013 |
You simply can't find a much better driver seat for a combination of long-distance comfort and support during aggressive cornering than the one in the BMW 135is. The seat feels firm and substantial, but with enough padding that church pew metaphors will remain far from your mind. The side bolsters are power-adjustable, so they can be snug when you want them to be snug, but not otherwise. Neither of the other cars has adjustable bolsters, and the Z's are too widely spaced for my average build. The BMW's seats also felt the most comfortable to me.
see full BMW 1-Series review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW 1-Series
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW 1-Series.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.