Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Cadillac ATS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 109.3 in | 6.7 in |
Length | 202.0 in | 182.8 in | 19.2 in |
Width | 79.0 in | 71.1 in | 7.9 in |
Height | 76.9 in | 55.9 in | 21 in |
Curb Weight | 5636 lb. | 3373 lb. | 2263 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 10 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.1 in | 38.6 in | 2.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 65.3 in | 55.2 in | 10.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 64.4 in | 53.0 in | 11.4 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 42.5 in | -1.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 36.8 in | 2.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.2 in | 53.9 in | 11.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 52.3 in | 8.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 33.5 in | 5.5 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 37.9 in | 0.0 in | 37.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.7 in | 0.0 in | 61.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.1 in | 0.0 in | 49.1 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 25.6 in | 0.0 in | 25.6 in |
Total Legroom | 105.9 in (over 3 rows) | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 29.9 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.9 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 6.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 60.3 ft3 | 10.2 | 50.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 108.9 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 98.7 ft3 |
2010 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range |
I drive about a 1000 miles a week. After driving the Suburban for 2 months, my back problems have gone away. Feel fresh after a 3 hour drive see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2010 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range |
Family and cargo fit comfortably see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.