| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2006 Cadillac CTS Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2006 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Cadillac CTS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 113.4 in | 2.6 in |
| Length | 202.0 in | 190.1 in | 11.9 in |
| Width | 79.0 in | 70.6 in | 8.4 in |
| Height | 76.9 in | 56.7 in | 20.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 5448 lb. | 3509 lb. | 1939 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal. | 17.5 gal. | 8.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 41.1 in | 38.9 in | 2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 65.3 in | 56.6 in | 8.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 64.4 in | 53.4 in | 11 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 42.4 in | -1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 36.9 in | 2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.2 in | 56.2 in | 9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 53.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 36.2 in | 2.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.9 in | 0.0 in | 37.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.7 in | 0.0 in | 61.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.1 in | 0.0 in | 49.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 25.6 in | 0.0 in | 25.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 105.9 in (over 3 rows) | 78.6 in (over 2 rows) | 27.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.9 ft3 | 12.5 ft3 | 4.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 60.3 ft3 | 12.5 | 47.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 108.9 ft3 | 12.5 ft3 | 96.4 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Cadillac CTS
| 2006 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Size of the car gives it lots of interior room compared to comparably priced cars in segment see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Front seats are roomy and well-fitted, very comfortable. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
FRONT SEATS, WIDE, HEATED.. ADJUSTABLE CONFORTABLE FOR 4 PEOPLES SMOOTH RIDE.... see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
It is enjoyable to sit in for long periods of time because the seat is so adjustable. The heated seats are incredibly hot for those cold days. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Power bucket seats with Alcantara inserts and side bolsters are great in cornering at speed. Comfortable for all day drives. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2006 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Seats were horrible. Could not find a comfortable position plus the center console along with the key fob hanging from the ignition contacted my leg. My 06 Grand Prix was much more comfortable. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Shorter wheelbase can lead to things being a little cramped in the rear. Also, no rear-seat vents for AC/heater! For shame, Cadillac... Audi figured this out long ago. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
little leg room for adults see full Cadillac CTS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
