Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2006 GMC Terrain GMC Terrain 2018

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2006) vs. GMC Terrain (2018) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2018 GMC Terrain specs.

2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year 2006 2018  
Model Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban GMC Terrain  
Engine 6.0L V8
OHV-2v
335 hp@5200
375 lb-ft@4000
turbocharged
2.0L I4
DOHC-4v
252 hp@5500
260 lb-ft@2500
 
Transmission 4-speed automatic 9-speed shiftable automatic  
Drivetrain AWD 4WD  
Body 4dr SUV 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 116.0 in 107.3 in 8.7 in
Length 198.8 in 182.3 in 16.5 in
Width 78.8 in 72.4 in 6.4 in
Height 74.8 in 65.4 in 9.4 in
Curb Weight 5513 lb. 3756 lb. 1757 lb.
Fuel Capacity 26.0 gal. 14.9 gal. 11.1 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 40.7 in 40.0 in 0.7 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 65.2 in 57.2 in 8 in
Hip Room, Row 1 61.4 in 54.4 in 7 in
Legroom, Row 1 41.3 in 40.9 in 0.4 in
Headroom, Row 2 39.4 in 38.5 in 0.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 65.1 in 55.6 in 9.5 in
Hip Room, Row 2 61.3 in 51.8 in 9.5 in
Legroom, Row 2 38.6 in 39.7 in -1.1 in
Headroom, Row 3 37.4 in 0.0 in 37.4 in
Shoulder Room, Row 3 64.4 in 0.0 in 64.4 in
Hip Room, Row 3 49.0 in 0.0 in 49 in
Legroom, Row 3 27.3 in 0.0 in 27.3 in
Total Legroom 107.2 in (over 3 rows) 80.6 in (over 2 rows) 26.6 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 16.3 ft3 29.6 ft3 -13.3 ft3
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 63.6 ft3 29.6 34 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 104.6 ft3 63.3 ft3 41.3 ft3

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban

2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
like riding first class in an airplane see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
There is plenty of space for all of the passengers and personal gear. The bucket seats add a lot of comfort. They also allow some extra room for third row passengers. Leather is the way to go, and the heated seats come in handy on those cold winter days. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
the best! had a back operation three years ago and this was thed only vehicle i am comfortable in see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2006 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
GMT800 series vehicles fit me better than any other. I prefer the '06 Tahoe to the '09 GMC Sierra i had prior to the Equinox i traded for the Tahoe. The Equinox was okay on a straight road, other than that, it was terrible! No lateral support at see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
inability to flat fold seat see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2018 The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.