| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2006 Honda S2000 Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2006 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Honda S2000 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 94.5 in | 21.5 in |
| Length | 204.0 in | 162.2 in | 41.8 in |
| Width | 80.5 in | 68.9 in | 11.6 in |
| Height | 74.4 in | 50.0 in | 24.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 5466 lb. | 2855 lb. | 2611 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 12.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 42.8 in | 34.6 in | 8.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 64.8 in | 50.7 in | 14.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 60.8 in | 49.8 in | 11 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 45.3 in | 44.3 in | 1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.7 in | 0.0 in | 38.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.1 in | 0.0 in | 65.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.3 in | 0.0 in | 60.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 0.0 in | 39 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 38.1 in | 0.0 in | 38.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 62.6 in | 0.0 in | 62.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.3 in | 0.0 in | 49.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 24.8 in | 0.0 in | 24.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | 44.3 in (over 1 rows) | 64.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.3 ft3 | 5.0 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 51.6 ft3 | 5.0 | 46.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 94.7 ft3 | 5.0 ft3 | 89.7 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Honda S2000
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seats are aggressively bolstered, but fit very comfortably. I am a 6 foot tall slightly overweight male. The seat adjusts adequately to my height, unlike several other convertibles I have driven. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Fits taller people than other roadsters I have tried. Probably comparable with modern BMW Z4 but I did not try that. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seat feels hard and is difficult to get adjusted properly. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
this car is engineered for speed, no wasted space.front quarters are cramped as one would expect with a roadster see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 6' tall with a 33" inseam, 149 lbs, 30" waist. I fit exactly in every direction. The hip width of the seats is exactly mine, the seat is all the way back, and the back is ever so slightly tipped upwards from full back. Comfortable but see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 5' 9" and 185# and of average frame proportions. The seat bolsters are Proportioned for the Asian torso. So, the average-to-large European butt isn't going to appreciate the tight seat bolsters. This is why the bolsters quickly break down and need re-padding with firm foam. see full Honda S2000 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
