Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | 5.3L V8 OHV-2v 320 hp@5400 335 lb-ft@4000 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 224 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,131 mm | 4,656 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,007 mm | 1,801 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,953 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,556 kg | 1,620 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 63 L | 35 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,659 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,636 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 975 mm | 21 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,656 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,539 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 947 mm | 44 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 963 mm | 907 mm | 56 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,567 mm | 1,285 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,247 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 650 mm | 716 mm | -66 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,690 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 479 L | 292 L | 187 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,708 L | 968 L | -967 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,084 L | 1,792 L | 2 L |
2011 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range |
I drive about a 1000 miles a week. After driving the Suburban for 2 months, my back problems have gone away. Feel fresh after a 3 hour drive see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2010 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range |
Family and cargo fit comfortably see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander.