Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2016) vs. Nissan Quest (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2016 Nissan Quest specs.
2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2016 Nissan Quest Specifications
Model Year |
2016 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban |
Nissan Quest |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Minivan, ext. |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,946 mm |
3,000 mm |
-1 mm |
Length |
5,182 mm |
5,100 mm |
0 mm |
Width |
2,045 mm |
1,971 mm |
1 mm |
Height |
1,890 mm |
1,816 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
2,479 kg |
1,981 kg |
1 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
98 L |
76 L |
22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,087 mm |
1,069 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,646 mm |
1,638 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,544 mm |
1,455 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,151 mm |
1,113 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
983 mm |
1,057 mm |
982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,654 mm |
1,605 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,532 mm |
1,676 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
991 mm |
932 mm |
59 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
968 mm |
1,016 mm |
967 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,590 mm |
1,554 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,252 mm |
1,260 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
630 mm |
1,029 mm |
629 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,771 mm (over 3 rows) |
3,073 mm (over 3 rows) |
-1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
433 L |
994 L |
-561 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,461 L |
1,801 L |
0 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
2,682 L |
3,070 L |
-1 L |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
2015 |
Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive.
The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition).
Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it.
In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result.
The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Nissan Quest
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Nissan Quest.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.