| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2007 Subaru Forester Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2007 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Subaru Forester | |
| Engine | 5.3L V8 OHV-2v 355 hp@5600 383 lb-ft@4100 |
turbocharged 2.5L H4 DOHC-4v 224 hp@5600 226 lb-ft@3600 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 4-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,525 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,182 mm | 4,486 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,045 mm | 1,735 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,890 mm | 1,651 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,479 kg | 1,520 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 60 L | 38 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,087 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,646 mm | 1,359 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,544 mm | 1,311 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,151 mm | 1,107 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 1,008 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,654 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,532 mm | 1,311 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 856 mm | 135 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 968 mm | 0 mm | 968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,590 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,252 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 630 mm | 0 mm | 630 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,963 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 433 L | 906 L | -473 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,461 L | 32.0 | -31 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,682 L | 1,634 L | 1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Subaru Forester
| 2007 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
easy to find comfortable position; no problems driving over an hour or more; good upright position see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2007 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 224hp 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
Front driver leg room is a little cramped from side to side. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
No thigh or lumbar support, seats hrad, minimal leg room for front passenger see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Not acceptable for an adult in any of the three rear seating positions see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
Again, cramped and too small for larger people. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 230hp 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
This is honesty the only complaint i have about the 2006 XT. The rear seat is a bit tight. We took three other adults on about a 4 hour trip and it was a tight fit - good thing we're good friends! My wife's 2009 Forester is much better in the rear legroom department. see full Subaru Forester review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
