| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2009 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2009 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | 5.3L V8 OHV-2v 265 kW@5600 519 Nm@4100 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 200 kW@6200 336 Nm@4700 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,182 mm | 4,806 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,045 mm | 1,806 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,890 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,479 kg | 1,570 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 70 L | 28 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,087 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,646 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,544 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,151 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 960 mm | 23 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,654 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,532 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 973 mm | 18 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 968 mm | 0 mm | 968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,590 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,252 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 630 mm | 0 mm | 630 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 433 L | 425 L | 8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,461 L | 15.0 | -14 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,682 L | 15.0 | -13 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Camry
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
