| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2016 Volvo V60 Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Volvo V60 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 109.3 in | 6.7 in |
| Length | 198.8 in | 182.5 in | 16.3 in |
| Width | 78.8 in | 73.4 in | 5.4 in |
| Height | 74.8 in | 58.4 in | 16.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 5028 lb. | 3527 lb. | 1501 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal. | 17.8 gal. | 8.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 38.7 in | 2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 65.2 in | 57.0 in | 8.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 61.4 in | 54.9 in | 6.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.9 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 37.4 in | 2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.1 in | 55.2 in | 9.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 61.3 in | 53.5 in | 7.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 33.5 in | 5.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.4 in | 0.0 in | 37.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 64.4 in | 0.0 in | 64.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.0 in | 0.0 in | 49 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 27.3 in | 0.0 in | 27.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 107.2 in (over 3 rows) | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 31.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.3 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 | 1.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 63.6 ft3 | 15.2 | 48.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 104.6 ft3 | 43.8 ft3 | 60.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
like riding first class in an airplane see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
There is plenty of space for all of the passengers and personal gear. The bucket seats add a lot of comfort. They also allow some extra room for third row passengers. Leather is the way to go, and the heated seats come in handy on those cold winter days. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
the best! had a back operation three years ago and this was thed only vehicle i am comfortable in see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
GMT800 series vehicles fit me better than any other. I prefer the '06 Tahoe to the '09 GMC Sierra i had prior to the Equinox i traded for the Tahoe. The Equinox was okay on a straight road, other than that, it was terrible! No lateral support at see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
inability to flat fold seat see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review | |
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
