

Model Year | 2002 | 2015 | |
Model | Chevrolet Tracker | Buick Regal | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2002 Chevrolet Tracker Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
very tight for bigger people see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
small seat, crampted see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
limited legroom see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
2003 | 4dr SUV 127-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Its abit small for adults, or large car seats. see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
2015 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Both the Regal and 200 have much less rear seat room than the average midsize sedan. Adults up to about six feet in height will fit, but with little room to spare. see full Buick Regal review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Buick Regal.