| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2010 Mercury Mountaineer Specifications
| Model Year | 2004 | 2010 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tracker | Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
very tight for bigger people see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
small seat, crampted see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
limited legroom see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 127-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Its abit small for adults, or large car seats. see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercury Mountaineer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Mercury Mountaineer.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
