| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2002 Chevrolet Tracker and 2016 Volkswagen Passat Specifications
| Model Year | 2002 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tracker | Volkswagen Passat | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
very tight for bigger people see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
small seat, crampted see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
limited legroom see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 127-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Its abit small for adults, or large car seats. see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volkswagen Passat
| 2016 Volkswagen Passat Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Passat's top strength remains a non-sporting attribute: never mind how the specs compare, the midsize Volkswagen has the roomiest interior in its class. Rear seat legroom seems limo-like compared to the merely adequate space inside the Mazda. Up front, there's also plenty of stretch-out space for heads, shoulders, and knees. The Passat's trunk is also among the largest, though in this area the Mazda comes up only a cubic foot short. see full Volkswagen Passat review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volkswagen Passat
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volkswagen Passat.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
