Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
Model | Chevrolet TrailBlazer | Chevrolet SS | |
Engine | 6.0L V8 OHV-2v 291 kW@6000 542 Nm@4000 |
6.2L V8 OHV-2v 309 kW@5900 563 Nm@4600 |
|
Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,870 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,872 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,897 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,842 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,019 kg | 1,813 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 71 L | 12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,021 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,486 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,422 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,090 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,478 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 940 mm | 1,008 mm | 939 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,029 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,237 L | 464 L | -463 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,268 L | 16.4 | -14.4 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |