| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Chevrolet Traverse and 2015 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,916 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,207 mm | 4,966 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,991 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,788 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,173 kg | 1,803 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 72 L | 11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,008 mm | 934 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 464 L | 227 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 16.4 | -13.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2012 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Although the rear captain seats are quite comfortable, I do not like how they roll forward. There is a track in the floor in which the rear seats fold and slide up behind the front seats. All I notice when in the back seat is how extremely difficult it is to clean out the mud and grit and salt (I live in Canada, we use salt on our roads) that gets left behind in the track from passenger footwear. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
