| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Traverse and 2012 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,868 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,207 mm | 5,154 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,991 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,788 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,173 kg | 1,821 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 76 L | 7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 960 mm | -959 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 968 mm | -33 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 569 L | 122 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 20.1 | -19.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 20.1 | -17.1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2010 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
