| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Traverse and 2013 Lexus RX Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Lexus RX | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 288 hp@6300 270 lb-ft@3400 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 270 hp@6200 248 lb-ft@4700 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.9 in | 107.9 in | 11 in |
| Length | 205.0 in | 187.8 in | 17.2 in |
| Width | 78.4 in | 74.2 in | 4.2 in |
| Height | 70.4 in | 66.3 in | 4.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 5066 lb. | 4343 lb. | 723 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 19.2 gal. | 2.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 39.1 in | 1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 62.0 in | 58.0 in | 4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 55.5 in | 3.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 43.1 in | -1.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 37.7 in | 1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.3 in | 57.6 in | 3.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 54.5 in | 3.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 36.8 in | 0 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.8 in | 0.0 in | 37.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.6 in | 0.0 in | 57.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 0.0 in | 48.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 33.2 in | 0.0 in | 33.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 111.3 in (over 3 rows) | 79.9 in (over 2 rows) | 31.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 24.4 ft3 | 40.0 ft3 | -15.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 68.8 ft3 | 40.0 | 28.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 116.4 ft3 | 80.3 ft3 | 36.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2010 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Lexus RX
| 2013 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Lexus have also tended to be more comfortable than competitors. The front seats in the RX are generously sized and very comfortably shaped. They're softer than those in competitors (the Cadillac SRX's buckets are borderline hard), yet are properly supportive. Though the side bolsters aren't large--only the upholstery, black with white perforations, differs from the regular RX 350--lateral support is sufficient for how the Lexus asks to be driven (we'll get to this). see full Lexus RX review | |
| 2013 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Probably because they were designed to fold in a single step to form a nearly flat floor, the 40-20-40 rear seats in the RX 350 aren't nearly as comfortable as the front seats. Passengers have plenty of room, but the seat cushion is too low to provide adults with thigh support and the seat back is too flat. The rear seat in the SRX isn't as roomy, and isn't much more comfortable. But I'd much rather spend time in the back seat of some other competitors. see full Lexus RX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Lexus RX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Lexus RX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
