| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Chevrolet Traverse and 2017 Mazda CX-3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2017 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Mazda CX-3 | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 281 hp@6300 266 lb-ft@3400 |
2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 146 hp@6000 146 lb-ft@2800 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.9 in | 101.2 in | 17.7 in |
| Length | 205.0 in | 168.3 in | 36.7 in |
| Width | 78.4 in | 69.6 in | 8.8 in |
| Height | 70.4 in | 60.7 in | 9.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 5066 lb. | 2952 lb. | 2114 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 12.7 gal. | 9.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 38.4 in | 2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 62.0 in | 53.5 in | 8.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 52.3 in | 6.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.7 in | -0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 37.2 in | 2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.3 in | 50.4 in | 10.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 49.0 in | 8.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 35.0 in | 1.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.8 in | 0.0 in | 37.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.6 in | 0.0 in | 57.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 0.0 in | 48.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 33.2 in | 0.0 in | 33.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 111.3 in (over 3 rows) | 76.7 in (over 2 rows) | 34.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 24.4 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 | 12 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 68.8 ft3 | 12.4 | 56.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 116.4 ft3 | 44.5 ft3 | 71.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2012 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Although the rear captain seats are quite comfortable, I do not like how they roll forward. There is a track in the floor in which the rear seats fold and slide up behind the front seats. All I notice when in the back seat is how extremely difficult it is to clean out the mud and grit and salt (I live in Canada, we use salt on our roads) that gets left behind in the track from passenger footwear. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3
| 2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review | |
| 2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
