Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 288 hp@6300 270 lb-ft@3400 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 224 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,670 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,207 mm | 4,656 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,991 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,788 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,298 kg | 1,620 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 63 L | 20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 947 mm | -12 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 907 mm | 53 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 1,285 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 716 mm | 127 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 292 L | 399 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 968 L | -967 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 1,792 L | 2 L |
2012 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Although the rear captain seats are quite comfortable, I do not like how they roll forward. There is a track in the floor in which the rear seats fold and slide up behind the front seats. All I notice when in the back seat is how extremely difficult it is to clean out the mud and grit and salt (I live in Canada, we use salt on our roads) that gets left behind in the track from passenger footwear. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.