Chevrolet Trax (2015) vs. Subaru Outback (2006) Specs

vs.

◆

2015 Chevrolet Trax and 2006 Subaru Outback Specifications

Model Year	2015	2006
Model	Chevrolet Trax	Subaru Outback
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr SUV	4dr Wagon
			Difference
Wheelbase	100.6 in	105.1 in	-4.5 in
Length	167.2 in	188.7 in	-21.5 in
Width	69.9 in	69.7 in	0.2 in
Height	65.9 in	63.2 in	2.7 in
Curb Weight	3048 lb.	3320 lb.	-272 lb.
Fuel Capacity	14.0 gal.	16.9 gal.	-2.9 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	39.6 in	40.5 in	-0.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	54.1 in	54.4 in	-0.3 in
Hip Room, Row 1	51.7 in	51.0 in	0.7 in
Legroom, Row 1	40.8 in	44.1 in	-3.3 in
Headroom, Row 2	38.8 in	39.1 in	-0.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	52.8 in	53.7 in	-0.9 in
Hip Room, Row 2	50.7 in	52.6 in	-1.9 in
Legroom, Row 2	35.7 in	33.9 in	1.8 in
Total Legroom	76.5 in (over 2 rows)	78 in (over 2 rows)	-1.5 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	18.7 ft³	33.5 ft³	-14.8 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	48.4 ft³	66.2 ft³	-17.8 ft³

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Trax

2015 Chevrolet Trax Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	There's much more room inside the Trax than many people expect given its compact exterior. At 5-9, I could sit behind myself with a few inches of knee room to spare. But if the people in the front seats are taller than me, those in the back seat better be shorter. The Renegade and 500X have about the same amount of rear knee room as the Trax. They have a couple inches more shoulder room, though, so fitting three people in back is a little less of a squeeze. (It will still help if they enjoy physical contact with one another.) The Honda HR-V isn't wider, but does have a few more inches of rear legroom. On the other hand, the rear seats in the Nissan JUKE and MINI Countryman are tighter than that in the Trax. see full Chevrolet Trax review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Trax

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Trax.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Subaru Outback

2006 Subaru Outback Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Leg and head room lacking for over 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Seat back a bit low for 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	I was amazed at how small the back seat is in this car. Really no bigger than a compact sedan, eg Civic or Corolla. I can't fit my 3 kids (in car seats) back there, and feel bad when co-workers pile in to go to lunch. Surprisingly small for a vehicle this size, and marketed as a "family car." If you plan to put adults or 3 kids back there regularly, look at the '10 or newer (or at something else -- the rear seat in my co-worker's Accord is far bigger and more comfortable). see full Subaru Outback review
2006	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	Too small for kids see full Subaru Outback review
2006	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Too short! I am 6ft tall and the front passenger seat leaves me feeling very cramped. Drivers position is better. Seats also too narrow. Maybe plenty of room for skinny folks, but not for us folks that are large boned :-) see full Subaru Outback review
2005	4dr Wagon 168-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	The Outback is much smaller (but not cheaper) than the XC70. see full Subaru Outback review
2005	4dr Wagon 168-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	very tight and narrow rear seat room. feels much bumpier in the rear seat than the front seat. see full Subaru Outback review

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.